News Summary
Birmingham city leaders have initiated a lawsuit against SB330, claiming it racially discriminates and undermines local governance of the Birmingham Water Works Board. Mayor Randall Woodfin and the City Council contend that the legislation unfairly reduces board representation while diluting local control and jeopardizing critical funding agreements. The complaint notes concerns about racial bias in the appointments and asserts violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled for May 2025 as the city seeks to defend its interests.
Birmingham – Birmingham city leaders have taken legal action against the recently enacted SB330, arguing that the legislation is racially discriminatory and undermines local governance of the Birmingham Water Works Board. Mayor Randall Woodfin and the Birmingham City Council filed the lawsuit on the same day Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed the bill into law, aiming to prevent its enactment and seeking a trial by jury on all triable issues.
The amended complaint includes not only the state’s top officials, such as Lt. Governor Will Ainsworth and Attorney General Steve Marshall but also several county commissions. The plaintiffs assert that there are no legitimate claims regarding mismanagement against the Birmingham Water Works and contend that the law unfairly reduces Birmingham’s representation from six out of nine board members to just two, despite 92% of the utility’s customers residing in Jefferson County and 44% within Birmingham limits.
In addition, the lawsuit claims that SB330 is a product of racial discrimination, citing comments made by a legislator who allegedly referred to Montgomery as “Monkey Town,” an indication of underlying racial biases. The plaintiffs assert that the restructured board reflects predominantly white appointments, diminishing representation for the majority Black population in the area.
The legal challenge stems from concerns that the new board will not only dilute local governance but also jeopardize existing agreements, such as the franchise fees currently paid to Birmingham by the utility. These fees are critical for funding city services and infrastructure. The lawsuit claims this legislative change violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution.
The bill, sponsored by State Senator Dan Roberts, gained support from local representatives who cited issues such as alleged billing problems and public trust concerns in the Birmingham Water Works. Critics of the law, including Mayor Woodfin, have labeled the rationale for its introduction as politically manipulative and racially insensitive.
Following its introduction, the new regional board appointed by the state has requested an audit of $2.6 million in contracts, alongside investigating notable instances of reported copper theft involving utility employees. These developments have raised further questions about the board’s governance and oversight capabilities.
An evidentiary hearing and oral argument regarding the lawsuit are scheduled for May 15, 2025. This comes after a motion for a temporary restraining order against SB330 was denied, allowing the law to move forward while the litigation continues. As of now, the state has not yet filed a formal response to the amended complaint, leaving many details of this ongoing legal battle unresolved.
The Birmingham City Council, in response to the challenges posed by SB330, has passed resolutions aimed at maintaining local control over the water works and safeguarding Birmingham’s interests amidst these legislative changes. These efforts indicate a strong commitment to defending the city’s governance and ensuring fair representation for its constituents, particularly in light of concerns over race and equity in local management.
As this case unfolds, it highlights the complex interplay of race, politics, and governance in Alabama, raising broader questions about representation in public utilities and local government structures. The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely monitored, not only for its immediate impact on Birmingham but also as a potential precedent for similar disputes across the state.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Jo Ann Prentice, LPGA Pioneer, Passes Away
Birmingham Water Works Board Asset Transfer Ruled Illegal
Archibald & Woodrow’s BBQ Opens in Birmingham
Alabama House Approves Major Changes to Birmingham Water Works Board
Birmingham Leaders Rally Against State Bill on Water Works Board
Birmingham City Council Boosts Local Economy with BBQ Investment
Archibald & Woodrow’s BBQ to Open in Birmingham
Birmingham Officials Rally Against Senate Bill 330 Restructuring Water Works Authority
Birmingham Water Works Board Challenges Senate Bill 330
Alabama Senate Approves Transition of Birmingham Water Works Board
Additional Resources
- 1819 News: Birmingham Water Works Lawsuit
- AL.com: Birmingham Court Fight Over Water Works
- ABC3340: Judge Denies Restraining Order
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Birmingham, Alabama
- Google Search: Birmingham Water Works lawsuit
