Supreme Court Decides on Firearm Possession in Domestic Violence Cases: What it Implies for North Carolina
In a notable decision by the United States Supreme Court, it was reaffirmed that individuals accused or convicted of domestic violence can be legally barred from owning firearms. This draws attention to the applicability and possible interpretation of this landmark ruling in the realm of North Carolina’s domestic violence regulation.
The Historic Supreme Court Decision
The Supreme Court verdict, pronounced on June 21, 2024, in the case of United States v. Rahimi, substantiates that firearms prohibition for those accused or convicted of domestic violence does not go against the Second Amendment. The judgment is significant for its potential to uphold laws aimed at protecting victims of abuse from gun-related violence. Had the court decided otherwise, North Carolina’s laws that require individuals with domestic violence protective orders to surrender their guns could have come under constitutional scrutiny. As the court validated the federal law concerning the same principle, North Carolina’s laws seem to sustain their constitutional validity, removing any legal grounds for local officials who claimed constitutional concerns when deciding against fully implementing such court orders of gun seizures.
Federal Laws and State Reception
Federal law orders that persons convicted in any court for a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” cannot possess or purchase firearms and ammunition. This principle also applies to those with certain domestic violence protective orders, denying them similar access. Several states have adapted laws mirroring these federal statutes and addressing loopholes to offer better protection to victims of domestic violence. While North Carolina does incorporate provisions of this nature, advocacy groups such as Giffords opine that the state’s efforts in this regard require further attention.
The Current State of Domestic Violence and Gun Laws in North Carolina
North Carolina law presents a process for firearms removal from persons with Domestic Violence Protective Orders (DVPOs) against them. However, gun ownership or purchasing is not illegal for perpetrators of domestic violence as per state law. Moreover, firearms cannot be promptly removed from a domestic violence situation by state and local police. Instead, a subsequent court order is necessary. This federal ruling leaves room for North Carolina and other states to bolster protection for those targeted by domestic violence by invoking stricter gun control measures against offenders.
The Case of United States v. Rahimi: A Second Amendment Examination
The case of United States v. Rahimi examines a federal law prohibiting anyone with a domestic violence protective order from possessing or purchasing firearms. Zackey Rahimi, the respondent, faced a federal conviction under this law on finding firearms in his possession amidst a restraining order. He argued that this was a violation of the Second Amendment, a claim initially agreed with by an appellate court, citing the landmark 2022 Bruen decision. However, the Supreme Court overruled this in June 2024, stating that the federal law in question preserves Constitutionality.
While the Rahimi case concerns the protective orders aspect, it is inferred that other provisions in the same law – like banning domestic violence misdemeanants from owning guns – would also resist a Second Amendment challenge.
Representatives Tackle Strengthening NC Domestic Violence Laws
Before the 2023 long session, the North Carolina Domestic Violence Commission approved a legislative agenda listing several legislative goals. Among these is the institution of extreme risk protective orders. These work to temporarily disarm individuals posing significant risks of harm to themselves or others with firearms. Despite the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act allowing the utilization of federal grants for their implementation, the proposal has seen no action since its referral to the House Rules Committee in May 2021.
In a similar vein, Senator Jay Chaudhuri introduced a bill on April 30 to apply a ban to individuals convicted in a state court for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence from owning or purchasing firearms. While there has been no action on the bill since its referral to the House Rules Committee on May 1, it is likely supporters will have to wait at least until the 2025 long session for its reconsideration.
Author: STAFF HERE BIRMINGHAM WRITER
The BIRMINGHAM STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HEREBirmingham.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in Birmingham, Jefferson County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as the Sidewalk Film Festival, Sloss Music & Arts Festival, Magic City Classic, and civil rights commemorations. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the Birmingham Business Alliance and the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute, plus leading businesses in healthcare, finance, and manufacturing that power the local economy such as UAB Medicine, Regions Bank, and Encompass Health. As part of the broader HERE network, including HEREHuntsville.com, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into Alabama's dynamic landscape.
